The Real Cost of Relying on ROAS in a Profit-First World

ROAS (Return on Ad Spend) has become one of the most commonly used metrics in Amazon advertising. For many brands, it is the first number they check when reviewing campaign performance. If ROAS is high, ads are considered successful. If it drops, budgets are cut, or campaigns are paused.

The Real Cost of Relying on ROAS in a Profit-First World

ROAS (Return on Ad Spend) has become one of the most commonly used metrics in Amazon advertising. For many brands, it is the first number they check when reviewing campaign performance. If ROAS is high, ads are considered successful. If it drops, budgets are cut, or campaigns are paused.

But here’s the issue: a strong ROAS does not always mean a profitable business.

As Amazon becomes more competitive and advertising costs continue to rise, relying on ROAS alone can quietly reduce margins, limit growth, and create long-term cash-flow problems. 

This article explains why ROAS is an incomplete metric, how it can mislead decision-making, and why profit-first thinking is essential for sustainable Amazon growth.

Why ROAS Became the Default Amazon Metric

ROAS is simple and easy to understand. You spend money on ads and measure how much revenue those ads generate. For example, spending £1,000 and earning £4,000 in sales gives a ROAS of 4x.

Because of its simplicity, ROAS quickly became the standard metric for Amazon advertising. It’s visible inside the Amazon Ads dashboard, easy to compare, and widely used by sellers and service providers.

As brands begin to scale, many turn to an experienced Amazon marketing agency to manage campaigns and improve ROAS performance. While this often leads to better structure and efficiency, ROAS alone does not reveal whether the business is actually making money.

The problem isn’t ROAS itself — it’s what ROAS leaves out.

What ROAS Does Not Measure

ROAS only looks at ad spend and revenue. It ignores most of the costs that directly impact profitability.

Some of the major costs ROAS does not account for include:

  • Manufacturing or sourcing costs
  • Amazon referral fees
  • Fulfilment and storage fees
  • Shipping and logistics
  • Returns and damaged stock
  • Coupons, discounts, and promotions
  • Operational and overhead expenses

Because of this, a campaign can show a healthy ROAS while still generating little to no profit. This is especially common for low-margin products or brands running frequent promotions.

ROAS also fails to show whether sales are coming from new customers or existing ones. Campaigns targeting branded keywords often have very high ROAS but do little to expand reach or acquire new buyers.

The Hidden Risks of Chasing High ROAS

When ROAS becomes the primary KPI, it starts shaping decisions in ways that harm long-term performance.

Scaling Slows Down

High-ROAS campaigns usually have limited reach. When brands pause campaigns with lower ROAS, they often cut off discovery traffic that brings in new customers.

Many Amazon PPC agencies see brands stuck in a cycle where ads look efficient on paper, but overall growth plateaus. Without top-of-funnel investment, long-term scaling becomes difficult.

Growth Becomes Unbalanced

ROAS-focused strategies tend to prioritise:

  • Branded search terms
  • Low-risk keywords
  • Retargeting audiences

While these campaigns are important, relying on them too heavily creates an imbalance. Brands end up protecting existing demand rather than creating new demand, making it harder to expand into new categories or compete with aggressive sellers.

Cash Flow Issues Appear

High ROAS does not guarantee strong cash flow. Brands often increase ad spend because ROAS looks good, only to realise their margins cannot support inventory restocking or operational costs. ROAS does not show how much cash remains after all expenses are paid.

How to Shift from ROAS-First to Profit-First

Moving away from ROAS obsession doesn’t mean ignoring it. It means placing it in the right context.

Here’s how brands can make the shift:

  1. Track profitability at the ASIN level
  2. Know exactly how much each product earns after all costs.
  3. Separate campaigns by objective
  4. Compare like-for-like campaigns instead of judging everything by one metric.
  5. Review blended performance
  6. Look at the total impact of ads on the account, not individual campaigns in isolation.
  7. Consider long-term customer value
  8. Accept lower short-term ROAS when acquisition supports future revenue.
  9. Align ads with inventory and pricing
  10. Advertising decisions should support broader business goals.

Brands that adopt this approach gain more control and make better scaling decisions.

The Right Way to Use ROAS

ROAS still has value when used correctly. It can help identify inefficiencies, spot sudden changes in performance, and compare similar campaigns with the same intent.

Problems arise only when ROAS is treated as the most important metric instead of one part of a bigger picture. Balanced decision-making leads to healthier growth.

Conclusion

In a profit-first world, ROAS alone is no longer enough to guide Amazon advertising decisions. While it can offer useful insights, relying on it as the primary metric often results in missed growth opportunities and shrinking margins.

At Deltamatix, we believe advertising should support real business performance, not just attractive dashboard numbers. We focus on building strategies that prioritise profitability, long-term customer value, and sustainable scale. When brands move beyond ROAS and adopt a profit-first mindset, they gain clearer visibility, stronger control, and the confidence to grow without sacrificing margins.

Have a Question?

Fill out the form and we will be in touch shortly.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready for Results Now?

Book a call with one of our experts right away.